Video index
1. WORK SESSION:
A. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the neighborhood meeting and citizen reports for 716 West Oak Street. (Nana Appiah)
B. Hold a discussion regarding the Oak-Hickory Neighborhood Group application for the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant to install five historic styled street lights along the north side of Oak Street. (Katia Boykin)
C. Hold a discussion regarding Council approved topics for discussion and feedback at the tentatively scheduled joint City Council/Historic Landmark Commission meeting in October 2014. (Brian Lockley)
D. Receive an update regarding the citations issued for 1807 N. Bell Ave. (Brian Lockley)
Called to order at 547. No items for discussion. Going out of order since projector not working. Requested to table toi end of meeting the items A & B from work session. Laura motion, lynn second. All in favor.
Commissioners: Deb, Pati, Scott, Eric, Michele, Laura. Staff: lockley, knight, boykin, jackson, hansen, appiah, green
A. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the neighborhood meeting and citizen reports for 716 West Oak Street. (Nana Appiah)
B. Hold a discussion regarding the Oak-Hickory Neighborhood Group application for the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant to install five historic styled street lights along the north side of Oak Street. (Katia Boykin)
C. Hold a discussion regarding Council approved topics for discussion and feedback at the tentatively scheduled joint City Council/Historic Landmark Commission meeting in October 2014. (Brian Lockley)
D. Receive an update regarding the citations issued for 1807 N. Bell Ave. (Brian Lockley)
Called to order at 547. No items for discussion. Going out of order since projector not working. Requested to table toi end of meeting the items A & B from work session. Laura motion, lynn second. All in favor.
Commissioners: Deb, Pati, Scott, Eric, Michele, Laura. Staff: lockley, knight, boykin, jackson, hansen, appiah, green
C. Hold a discussion regarding Council approved topics for discussion and feedback at the tentatively scheduled joint City Council/Historic Landmark Commission meeting in October 2014. (Brian Lockley)
A. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the neighborhood meeting and citizen reports for 716 West Oak Street. (Nana Appiah)
B. Hold a discussion regarding the Oak-Hickory Neighborhood Group application for the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant to install five historic styled street lights along the north side of Oak Street. (Katia Boykin)
REGULAR MEETING
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
2. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MINUTES OF:
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a roof replacement on a single-family residence. The subject property is located at 805 Bolivar Street and is within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and is a locally designated historic landmark. (COA14-0038, 805 Bolivar Street, Cindy Jackson)
B. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1108 West Congress Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district. (HL14-0003, 1108 West Congress Street, Cindy Jackson)
C. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1120 North Locust Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Downtown Residential 2 (DR-2) zoning district. (HL14-0004, 1120 North Locust Street, Cindy Jackson)
D. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 311 Mounts Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and the Oak-Hickory Historic District. (HL14-0005, 311 Mounts Street, Cindy Jackson)
A. Consider approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a roof replacement on a single-family residence. The subject property is located at 805 Bolivar Street and is within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and is a locally designated historic landmark. (COA14-0038, 805 Bolivar Street, Cindy Jackson)
B. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1108 West Congress Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district. (HL14-0003, 1108 West Congress Street, Cindy Jackson)
C. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1120 North Locust Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Downtown Residential 2 (DR-2) zoning district. (HL14-0004, 1120 North Locust Street, Cindy Jackson)
D. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 311 Mounts Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and the Oak-Hickory Historic District. (HL14-0005, 311 Mounts Street, Cindy Jackson)
4. OTHER BUSINESS:
B. Preservation Officers Report
Boykin was discussing to get feedback to do preliminary is really a formality and doesnt require a PH, the final action does. Thoughts for putting on consent, since a number will be coming before us, Put on CA and if want to talk about a certain one can be taken to have action held on it. The backup and such will still be back up in packet. Laura- staff approved? Boykin provided info for how consent works. Pati- wouldnt support this. Feel when people are in the process and want to move forward, least we can do is to give them full opportunity to speak. I don't like CC consent agenda at CC. These are residents that have taken time and interest to come before us. Conte and if considered separately it gives times for the applicant to ask questions like Catherine did. This is the first round for them to have discussion. Laura I could go either way. I like the idea for consent. Unless there is something really standout then we are going to approve it. Conte since we have bene on this board havent been asked to vote for something we wouldnt fully agree with. What you are saying is it is basically consent any way. Eric I agree, wouldnt want to hold up the process any more. I like it being a part of the agenda some way so council knows the residents exist. They are adding value to them selves to their district, look, and upkeep, it deserve to be noticed. WE cant create or approve that. Would kinda be cool for themto know it, but that we get to have that interaction. Boykin do they come back for designation, for the HLC part of it. Laura if on consent would there be applicant or public time to speak. Conte no. pati never as this body vote on consent and dont see point on it. Conte dont see an issue with keeping it as it is, but see some questions for consent. So maybe to leave it as is. Commission agreed.
B. Preservation Officers Report
Boykin was discussing to get feedback to do preliminary is really a formality and doesnt require a PH, the final action does. Thoughts for putting on consent, since a number will be coming before us, Put on CA and if want to talk about a certain one can be taken to have action held on it. The backup and such will still be back up in packet. Laura- staff approved? Boykin provided info for how consent works. Pati- wouldnt support this. Feel when people are in the process and want to move forward, least we can do is to give them full opportunity to speak. I don't like CC consent agenda at CC. These are residents that have taken time and interest to come before us. Conte and if considered separately it gives times for the applicant to ask questions like Catherine did. This is the first round for them to have discussion. Laura I could go either way. I like the idea for consent. Unless there is something really standout then we are going to approve it. Conte since we have bene on this board havent been asked to vote for something we wouldnt fully agree with. What you are saying is it is basically consent any way. Eric I agree, wouldnt want to hold up the process any more. I like it being a part of the agenda some way so council knows the residents exist. They are adding value to them selves to their district, look, and upkeep, it deserve to be noticed. WE cant create or approve that. Would kinda be cool for themto know it, but that we get to have that interaction. Boykin do they come back for designation, for the HLC part of it. Laura if on consent would there be applicant or public time to speak. Conte no. pati never as this body vote on consent and dont see point on it. Conte dont see an issue with keeping it as it is, but see some questions for consent. So maybe to leave it as is. Commission agreed.
5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
6. ADJOURN:
Aug 11, 2014 Historic Landmark Commission
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
1. WORK SESSION:
A. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the neighborhood meeting and citizen reports for 716 West Oak Street. (Nana Appiah)
B. Hold a discussion regarding the Oak-Hickory Neighborhood Group application for the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant to install five historic styled street lights along the north side of Oak Street. (Katia Boykin)
C. Hold a discussion regarding Council approved topics for discussion and feedback at the tentatively scheduled joint City Council/Historic Landmark Commission meeting in October 2014. (Brian Lockley)
D. Receive an update regarding the citations issued for 1807 N. Bell Ave. (Brian Lockley)
Called to order at 547. No items for discussion. Going out of order since projector not working. Requested to table toi end of meeting the items A & B from work session. Laura motion, lynn second. All in favor.
Commissioners: Deb, Pati, Scott, Eric, Michele, Laura. Staff: lockley, knight, boykin, jackson, hansen, appiah, green
A. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the neighborhood meeting and citizen reports for 716 West Oak Street. (Nana Appiah)
B. Hold a discussion regarding the Oak-Hickory Neighborhood Group application for the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant to install five historic styled street lights along the north side of Oak Street. (Katia Boykin)
C. Hold a discussion regarding Council approved topics for discussion and feedback at the tentatively scheduled joint City Council/Historic Landmark Commission meeting in October 2014. (Brian Lockley)
D. Receive an update regarding the citations issued for 1807 N. Bell Ave. (Brian Lockley)
Called to order at 547. No items for discussion. Going out of order since projector not working. Requested to table toi end of meeting the items A & B from work session. Laura motion, lynn second. All in favor.
Commissioners: Deb, Pati, Scott, Eric, Michele, Laura. Staff: lockley, knight, boykin, jackson, hansen, appiah, green
C. Hold a discussion regarding Council approved topics for discussion and feedback at the tentatively scheduled joint City Council/Historic Landmark Commission meeting in October 2014. (Brian Lockley)
A. Receive a report and hold a discussion regarding the neighborhood meeting and citizen reports for 716 West Oak Street. (Nana Appiah)
B. Hold a discussion regarding the Oak-Hickory Neighborhood Group application for the Neighborhood Project Matching Grant to install five historic styled street lights along the north side of Oak Street. (Katia Boykin)
REGULAR MEETING
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
2. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MINUTES OF:
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Consider approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a roof replacement on a single-family residence. The subject property is located at 805 Bolivar Street and is within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and is a locally designated historic landmark. (COA14-0038, 805 Bolivar Street, Cindy Jackson)
B. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1108 West Congress Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district. (HL14-0003, 1108 West Congress Street, Cindy Jackson)
C. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1120 North Locust Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Downtown Residential 2 (DR-2) zoning district. (HL14-0004, 1120 North Locust Street, Cindy Jackson)
D. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 311 Mounts Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and the Oak-Hickory Historic District. (HL14-0005, 311 Mounts Street, Cindy Jackson)
A. Consider approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a roof replacement on a single-family residence. The subject property is located at 805 Bolivar Street and is within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and is a locally designated historic landmark. (COA14-0038, 805 Bolivar Street, Cindy Jackson)
B. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1108 West Congress Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located within a Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district. (HL14-0003, 1108 West Congress Street, Cindy Jackson)
C. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 1120 North Locust Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Downtown Residential 2 (DR-2) zoning district. (HL14-0004, 1120 North Locust Street, Cindy Jackson)
D. Consider a preliminary application for a Historic Landmark Designation request for the property located at 311 Mounts Street, and provide a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of the property to proceed to a final application. The site is located in the Neighborhood Residential 3 (NR-3) zoning district and the Oak-Hickory Historic District. (HL14-0005, 311 Mounts Street, Cindy Jackson)
4. OTHER BUSINESS:
B. Preservation Officers Report
Boykin was discussing to get feedback to do preliminary is really a formality and doesnt require a PH, the final action does. Thoughts for putting on consent, since a number will be coming before us, Put on CA and if want to talk about a certain one can be taken to have action held on it. The backup and such will still be back up in packet. Laura- staff approved? Boykin provided info for how consent works. Pati- wouldnt support this. Feel when people are in the process and want to move forward, least we can do is to give them full opportunity to speak. I don't like CC consent agenda at CC. These are residents that have taken time and interest to come before us. Conte and if considered separately it gives times for the applicant to ask questions like Catherine did. This is the first round for them to have discussion. Laura I could go either way. I like the idea for consent. Unless there is something really standout then we are going to approve it. Conte since we have bene on this board havent been asked to vote for something we wouldnt fully agree with. What you are saying is it is basically consent any way. Eric I agree, wouldnt want to hold up the process any more. I like it being a part of the agenda some way so council knows the residents exist. They are adding value to them selves to their district, look, and upkeep, it deserve to be noticed. WE cant create or approve that. Would kinda be cool for themto know it, but that we get to have that interaction. Boykin do they come back for designation, for the HLC part of it. Laura if on consent would there be applicant or public time to speak. Conte no. pati never as this body vote on consent and dont see point on it. Conte dont see an issue with keeping it as it is, but see some questions for consent. So maybe to leave it as is. Commission agreed.
B. Preservation Officers Report
Boykin was discussing to get feedback to do preliminary is really a formality and doesnt require a PH, the final action does. Thoughts for putting on consent, since a number will be coming before us, Put on CA and if want to talk about a certain one can be taken to have action held on it. The backup and such will still be back up in packet. Laura- staff approved? Boykin provided info for how consent works. Pati- wouldnt support this. Feel when people are in the process and want to move forward, least we can do is to give them full opportunity to speak. I don't like CC consent agenda at CC. These are residents that have taken time and interest to come before us. Conte and if considered separately it gives times for the applicant to ask questions like Catherine did. This is the first round for them to have discussion. Laura I could go either way. I like the idea for consent. Unless there is something really standout then we are going to approve it. Conte since we have bene on this board havent been asked to vote for something we wouldnt fully agree with. What you are saying is it is basically consent any way. Eric I agree, wouldnt want to hold up the process any more. I like it being a part of the agenda some way so council knows the residents exist. They are adding value to them selves to their district, look, and upkeep, it deserve to be noticed. WE cant create or approve that. Would kinda be cool for themto know it, but that we get to have that interaction. Boykin do they come back for designation, for the HLC part of it. Laura if on consent would there be applicant or public time to speak. Conte no. pati never as this body vote on consent and dont see point on it. Conte dont see an issue with keeping it as it is, but see some questions for consent. So maybe to leave it as is. Commission agreed.
5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
6. ADJOURN:
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://dentontx.new.swagit.com/videos/13951/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Download
Download
Download Selected Item
